Testing the nonclinical Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm with an established anti-seizure medication: Levetiracetam case study.

Levetiracetam (LEV), a well-established anti-seizure medication (ASM), was launched before the original ICH S7B nonclinical guidance assessing QT prolongation potential and the introduction of the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm. No information was available on its effects on cardiac channels. The goal of this work was to "pressure test" the CiPA approach with LEV and check the concordance of nonclinical core and follow-up S7B assays with clinical and post-marketing data. The following experiments were conducted with LEV (0.25-7.5 mM): patch clamp assays on hERG (acute or trafficking effects), NaV 1.5, CaV 1.2, Kir 2.1, KV 7.1/mink, KV 1.5, KV 4.3, and HCN4; in silico electrophysiology modeling (Virtual Assay® software) in control, large-variability, and high-risk human ventricular cell populations; electrophysiology measurements in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes and dog Purkinje fibers; ECG measurements in conscious telemetered dogs after single oral administration (150, 300, and 600 mg/kg). Except a slight inhibition (<10%) of hERG and KV 7.1/mink at 7.5 mM, that is, 30-fold the free therapeutic plasma concentration (FTPC) at 1500 mg, LEV did not affect any other cardiac channels or hERG trafficking. In both virtual and real human cardiomyocytes, and in dog Purkinje fibers, LEV induced no relevant changes in electrophysiological parameters or arrhythmia. No QTc prolongation was noted up to 2.7 mM unbound plasma levels in conscious dogs, corresponding to 10-fold the FTPC. Nonclinical assessment integrating CiPA assays shows the absence of QT prolongation and proarrhythmic risk of LEV up to at least 10-fold the FTPC and the good concordance with clinical and postmarketing data, although this does not exclude very rare occurrence of QT prolongation cases in patients with underlying risk factors.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Risk Minimization Measures of Sodium Oxybate in the European Union.

BACKGROUND: Sodium oxybate (Xyrem®), approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for narcolepsy with cataplexy, is only available through risk mitigation programs due to potential adverse effects including respiratory and central nervous system depression, neuropsychiatric events, and misuse. OBJECTIVE: We report findings from a survey evaluating effectiveness of the European Union Xyrem® Risk Management Plan (RMP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, online, multiple-choice survey was distributed to randomly selected healthcare professionals (HCPs) from six European countries (April 2016-May 2018). Eligibility criteria: current/potential Xyrem® prescriber and/or sleep disorder specialist; contact information available; on the Xyrem® RMP educational materials mailing list. PRIMARY OUTCOME: proportion of respondents answering each question correctly (< 50% responses correct = unsatisfactory comprehension, 50% to < 70% = satisfactory, ≥ 70% = excellent), with precision assessed using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of the 709 HCPs contacted, 601 did not agree to take part, 108 were screened with 35/108 eligible for inclusion; 31 HCPs completed the survey. Of the 31 respondents, 29 (93.5%; 95% CI 84.4-100.0) reported receiving Xyrem® safety information, commonly from a sales representative, EMA Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), or educational meeting; only 9/31 (31.0%; 14.3-50.0) recalled receiving mailed educational materials. The number of HCPs answering dosing-related questions correctly ranged from 24/31 to 31/31. All Xyrem® contraindications were correctly identified by 26/31 (83.9%; 70.0-96.7) respondents. All respondents 'always' or 'sometimes' completed SmPC recommended activities upon treatment initiation. The majority indicated signs of abuses/misuse/diversion (23/31; 74.2%; 58.6-88.0) and criminal use (23/31; 74.2%; 59.4-89.3) should be monitored at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the importance of providing a range of educational materials. However, the low sample size limits interpretation; increased HCP engagement would improve understanding of how best to develop educational materials. EUROPEAN POST-AUTHORIZATION STUDY (PAS) REGISTER NUMBER: EUPAS15024.

Long-term compliance, safety, and tolerability of sodium oxybate treatment in patients with narcolepsy type 1: a postauthorization, noninterventional surveillance study.

Study Objectives: To evaluate adherence to sodium oxybate prescribing information for indication and dosage, patients' compliance with instructions for use, safety/tolerability in routine clinical practice, and abuse potential. Methods: A postauthorization, noninterventional surveillance study (NCT00244465) in patients who were prescribed sodium oxybate according to current practice by sleep disorders specialists. Patients were monitored for ≤18 months. Results: Overall, 749 patients were enrolled; 730 included in the intent-to-treat population (narcolepsy type 1 n = 670, other indications n = 60). We report on patients with narcolepsy type 1 (female 47.9%, mean age 39.4 years); 495/670 (73.9%) completed the study. Median dose: at start of study 4.5 g per night, 6 g per night throughout study, in two equal doses. According to the treatment compliance checklist, 35.5 per cent of patients consumed alcohol, 19.3 per cent took the medication <2 hr after food, and 27.1 per cent did not adhere to recommended time schedule, with few associated treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Incidences of higher-than-recommended doses, difficulty in preparing doses, and abuse were low. TEAEs were reported by 67.3 per cent, most frequently headache (11.6%) and nasopharyngitis (6.4%). Discontinuation due to TEAEs: 8.8 per cent. Serious TEAEs: 6.4 per cent. There were no reports of respiratory depression. No particular safety concerns were identified in pediatric or elderly patients, or those with underlying sleep apnea. Conclusions: In this large postauthorization safety study of sodium oxybate use, indication and dosage prescribing recommendations were generally followed, and most patients complied with instructions, with deviations around alcohol consumption, eating before dosing and timing. The overall safety profile was consistent with previous observations; incidence of abuse was low. Section: Neurological disorders. Clinical Trial: Postauthorization, noninterventional, surveillance, pharmacoepidemiology study to evaluate long-term safety, tolerability, and compliance in administration of Xyrem (sodium oxybate) oral solution in patients who receive treatment with this medication in regular clinical practice. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00244465, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00244465.

Safety of cetirizine in pregnancy.

Managing symptoms of allergic rhinitis (AR) and urticaria in pregnant women is important to reduce complications and negative outcomes. The objective of this study was to provide information on the pregnancy outcomes of women exposed to the antihistamine cetirizine (CTZ). The UCB Pharma Patient Safety Database was searched for pregnancies up to 28 February 2015. Maternal CTZ exposure reports were extracted, and pregnancy outcomes were examined, including exposure, comorbidities and infant events. 228 of 522 pregnancies with maternal CTZ exposure had available outcomes; 49 were prospective. The majority (83.7%) resulted in live births; four spontaneous miscarriages, three induced abortions and one stillbirth were reported. Most pregnancies were exposed during the first trimester. Two congenital malformations were reported. The results suggest that CTZ exposure is not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes above the background rates. While reassuring, the strengths and limitations of a safety database study need to be considered. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? AR and urticaria can substantially affect pregnant women, and adequately managing their symptoms is important to reduce maternal and foetal complications. Antihistamines are efficacious, however, there is still a lack of data regarding use during pregnancy. Although current evidence indicates that antihistamines are well-tolerated during pregnancy, data regarding foetal safety are inconclusive. What do the results of this study add? Our study suggests that CTZ exposure during pregnancy is not linked to an increase in adverse outcomes. CTZ exposure mainly happened during the first trimester only, when most organogenesis takes place. Most of the maternally exposed, prospective pregnancies resulted in live births (83.7%). Congenital malformations occurred in 2/41 live births from the CTZ-exposed pregnancies. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Our study presents a detailed data analysis from a large number of CTZ-exposed pregnancies, and its results are in line with those from previous reports. While the limitations of a safety database study need to be considered, the results shown here are reassuring. Further prospectively reported pregnancies are required, before definite conclusions on the risks of CTZ exposure during pregnancy can be drawn.

Risk of QT prolongation and torsade de pointes associated with exposure to hydroxyzine: re-evaluation of an established drug.

Several noncardiac drugs have been linked to cardiac safety concerns, highlighting the importance of post-marketing surveillance and continued evaluation of the benefit-risk of long-established drugs. Here, we examine the risk of QT prolongation and/or torsade de pointes (TdP) associated with the use of hydroxyzine, a first generation sedating antihistamine. We have used a combined methodological approach to re-evaluate the cardiac safety profile of hydroxyzine, including: (1) a full review of the sponsor pharmacovigilance safety database to examine real-world data on the risk of QT prolongation and/or TdP associated with hydroxyzine use and (2) nonclinical electrophysiological studies to examine concentration-dependent effects of hydroxyzine on a range of human cardiac ion channels. Based on a review of pharmacovigilance data between 14th December 1955 and 1st August 2016, we identified 59 reports of QT prolongation and/or TdP potentially linked to hydroxyzine use. Aside from intentional overdose, all cases involved underlying medical conditions or concomitant medications that constituted at least 1 additional risk factor for such events. The combination of cardiovascular disorders plus concomitant treatment of drugs known to induce arrhythmia was identified as the greatest combined risk factor. Parallel patch-clamp studies demonstrated hydroxyzine concentration-dependent inhibition of several human cardiac ion channels, including the ether-a-go-go-related gene (hERG) potassium ion channels. Results from this analysis support the listing of hydroxyzine as a drug with "conditional risk of TdP" and are in line with recommendations to limit hydroxyzine use in patients with known underlying risk factors for QT prolongation and/or TdP.

Brivaracetam in Unverricht-Lundborg disease (EPM1): Results from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy, tolerability, and safety of adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in patients with Unverricht-Lundborg disease (EPM1). METHODS: Two prospective, multicenter, double-blind, phase III trials (N01187/NCT00357669; N01236/NCT00368251) in patients (≥16 years) with genetically ascertained EPM1, showing moderate-severe myoclonus (action myoclonus score ≥30/160), randomized (1:1:1) to twice-daily BRV (N01187: 50 or 150 mg/day; N01236: 5 or 150 mg/day), or placebo. Both studies comprised a baseline period (2 weeks), 2-week up-titration period, 12-week stable-dose maintenance period, and down-titration or entry into long-term follow-up study. Symptoms of myoclonus were assessed by Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS). Primary efficacy end point was percent reduction from baseline in action myoclonus score (UMRS section 4) at last treatment visit. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: N01187: 50 patients randomized, 47 completed; N01236: 56 patients randomized, 54 completed. Median (min-max) percent reduction from baseline in action myoclonus score is the following-N01187: placebo 5.6 (-81.3 to 53.8), pooled BRV group (primary efficacy analysis) 21.4 (-50.0 to 73.6), BRV 50 mg/day 26.3 (-35.8 to 69.2), BRV 150 mg/day 16.9 (-50.0 to 73.6); N01236: placebo 17.5 (-170 to 61.5), BRV 5 mg/day -4.6 (-430 to 81.8), BRV 150 mg/day (primary efficacy analysis) 12.3 (-58.3 to 96.9). Estimated differences versus placebo were not statistically significant. TEAEs were reported by 72-75% placebo-treated and 56-83% BRV-treated patients. SIGNIFICANCE: Effect of BRV on action myoclonus was not statistically significant. However, action myoclonus score showed wide intrapatient variability and may not have been the optimal tool to measure severity of myoclonus in EPM1. Both studies had very high completion rates (95.3% overall), and a high percentage of patients (88.7% overall) entered long-term follow-up; both likely to be influenced by good tolerability. These studies demonstrate the feasibility of rigorous trials in progressive myoclonic epilepsy.